YouTube tutorials, the 'going natural' journey, and the cultural shift that made Black women's hair a site of liberation
Around 2009, something shifted. Black women began posting videos on YouTube — not tutorials for relaxed hair, but documentation of a different kind of journey: the decision to stop chemically straightening their hair and grow out their natural texture. They called it "going natural." They called the moment of cutting off the relaxed ends "the big chop." And they filmed it.
The videos were raw, personal, and often emotional. Women sat in front of cameras and described the fear they felt before cutting their hair. They showed the scissors. They showed the pile of hair on the floor. They showed themselves, afterwards, touching their natural coils for the first time in years — or in some cases, for the first time ever.
What made the natural hair movement of the 2010s different from earlier iterations — the Black Power Afros of the 1960s, the Jheri curl era, the brief natural hair moment of the 1990s — was the internet. Specifically, it was YouTube.
Before YouTube, Black women seeking information about natural hair had limited options. Mainstream beauty magazines rarely covered natural textures. Drugstore shelves were stocked almost exclusively with products designed for relaxed or chemically treated hair. The knowledge of how to care for natural Black hair — how to moisturise it, how to detangle it, how to style it — was largely transmitted informally, from mother to daughter, from friend to friend.
YouTube changed the transmission model. Suddenly, a Black woman in Ohio could learn from a Black woman in London. A teenager in rural Georgia could find tutorials from a naturalista in Lagos. The knowledge that had been fragmented and localised became global and searchable.
One of the most significant intellectual contributions of the natural hair movement was the popularisation of the concept of hair porosity. The idea — that hair's ability to absorb and retain moisture varies depending on the structure of the cuticle — had existed in professional cosmetology for decades. But the natural hair community took it mainstream.
Suddenly, Black women were discussing low porosity versus high porosity, the LOC method (Liquid, Oil, Cream), the LCO method, protein sensitivity, and moisture-protein balance. The language was technical, the engagement was serious, and the community that formed around these discussions was genuinely educational.
This was not trivial. For generations, Black women had been told that their hair was "difficult," "unmanageable," "hard to deal with." The natural hair movement reframed this narrative: the hair was not difficult. The products and techniques designed for it had simply been inadequate — or nonexistent.
The natural hair movement was also an economic movement, though it was rarely framed that way. As millions of Black women stopped buying relaxers and started buying natural hair products, the beauty industry was forced to respond.
The relaxer market, which had been worth billions of dollars annually, began to decline. New brands — many of them founded by Black women, many of them specifically formulated for natural textures — emerged to fill the gap. SheaMoisture, Camille Rose, TGIN, Mielle Organics: these were not just beauty brands. They were expressions of a community that had decided to invest in itself.
The natural hair movement was not without its internal tensions. The most significant was the politics of the curl pattern — the hierarchy that placed looser, more "defined" curls (3A, 3B, 3C) above tighter, kinkier textures (4A, 4B, 4C) in terms of desirability and representation.
Critics noted that the natural hair movement, for all its liberatory rhetoric, had sometimes reproduced the colourism and texturism it claimed to challenge. The most visible natural hair influencers often had looser curl patterns. The products most heavily marketed were often formulated for those textures. Women with 4C hair — the tightest, kinkiest texture, and the one most associated with West African ancestry — sometimes felt excluded from a movement that was ostensibly for them.
The 4C community pushed back, and the conversation it generated was one of the most important in the movement's history. It forced a reckoning with the ways in which anti-Blackness could operate even within Black spaces — and it produced a more expansive, more inclusive vision of what natural hair liberation could mean.
By the mid-2010s, the natural hair movement had achieved something remarkable: it had made natural Black hair visible, celebrated, and commercially significant in ways that had not existed a decade earlier. The big chop was no longer a radical act — it was a rite of passage, documented on social media, celebrated by communities, and supported by an entire ecosystem of products, tutorials, and events.
The movement did not solve anti-Black racism. It did not end hair discrimination. But it changed the terms of the conversation — and it gave a generation of Black women and girls a different relationship with their own heads.
Continue Reading
Explore more cultural essays, histories, and stories from The Art of Black Hair editorial.
All Articles